
How to Build a Self-Updating Knowledge Base with LLMs
A practical walkthrough on turning raw Markdown notes into a self-maintaining knowledge base, where AI agents handle tagging, sourcing, wiki-building, and visualization automatically.
Read More →


Elastic Growth, Zero Headcount
Elastic Growth, Zero Headcount
Scale 10x without hiring. AI assistants handle peak loads automatically, keeping your operations elastic and efficient.

Machine Learning Precision (99.9%)
Machine Learning Precision (99.9%)
Eliminate human error. Our ML-validated workflows guarantee data integrity across CRM, finance, and logistics systems.

True 24/7/365 Operations
True 24/7/365 Operations
Your AI workforce never sleeps, takes breaks, or burns out. Serve global clients nonstop.


AImpress turns chaos into a system. We build automations that save up to 75% of your time and boost sales.
→ instant answers 24/7
→ CRM, email, finance, inventory
→ AI creates posts, articles, product descriptions
→ campaigns, lead nurturing, ads on autopilot
The AI voice assistant AImpress set up answers our phone, takes messages, and routes urgent calls. We stopped missing leads overnight.
AImpress built us a website with built-in AI chat support. Our bounce rate dropped by half and average session time tripled. Seriously impressive work.
Axil Accountants Ltd highly recommend AIMPRESS LTD for their excellent work in automation and consulting. They bring clarity, efficiency, and smart solutions to complex processes, making everything easier for their clients. Professional team, clear communication, and great results — a reliable partner for any business looking to improve operations.
I enjoyed working with this company and am happy with the results!
AImpress built us an AI chatbot that handles 80% of customer queries around the clock. Our response time went from hours to seconds — clients love it.
Identify top-impact opportunities and define ROI metrics.
We audit your workflows, pinpoint bottlenecks, and map out the highest-ROI automation targets — all in a single focused session.
AIMPRESS PRODUCTS
From private transcription to structured learning, we build tools people can use every day.

A practical walkthrough on turning raw Markdown notes into a self-maintaining knowledge base, where AI agents handle tagging, sourcing, wiki-building, and visualization automatically.
Read More →
A developer just won VibeJam 2026 with a capybara game he built entirely through Claude Code, and the prize was $25,000. I read through his full...
Read More →
I was routing Claude Code through a proxy to mix in GPT models when I started digging into why my system prompts looked slightly off. Turns out I was...
Read More →Stop wasting time on routine. Start scaling with AI today.

The person who found this was doing something reasonable: running Claude Code through a personal proxy to blend multiple model providers. Starting with version 2.1.91, released April 2, 2026, the tool began checking whether a proxy was active. If it detected one, it modified the system prompt invisibly to report three things: whether you are in China, whether you are proxying to a Chinese URL, and whether you are affiliated with a Chinese AI lab.
That is not a feature listed in any changelog. The code was also obfuscated inside the binary, which is the part that turns this from a privacy concern into a trust problem. There is a meaningful difference between a company collecting data and a company collecting data while making it hard to find.
I went back through my own Claude Code setup after reading this. I do not use a proxy personally, so the detection code would not have fired for me. But I spent about twenty minutes reading through what other developers reported and verifying the version timeline. The claims check out in terms of when the version shipped and what the code does.
If you are building any kind of automated pipeline that routes Claude Code through a proxy, whether for cost reasons, model mixing, or just to keep traffic going through your own infrastructure, you were being fingerprinted without knowing it.
The practical concern here is not just about the specific China-related checks. It is about what this pattern means going forward. If Anthropic can insert silent telemetry into system prompt modifications in one version, the same mechanism can carry other data in future versions. You would not necessarily know unless someone else went hunting through a compiled binary.
For developers using Claude Code in any enterprise context, this is the kind of thing your security team is going to ask about. "Did you audit what this CLI tool adds to your prompts" is a reasonable question, and until last week most of us would have said yes without actually checking.
The fix for now is straightforward if blunt: pin your Claude Code version to something before 2.1.91 if proxy usage is part of your setup, and watch the repository for any official response from Anthropic. At the time of writing, there has been no public statement from the company addressing the specific claims.
This is the part that actually bothers me more than the technical details. The post got over 2,000 upvotes and hundreds of comments. Developers were clearly paying attention. Anthropic has not, as far as I can find, responded directly to the accusations about obfuscation or the undisclosed nature of the data collection.
There may be a national security rationale they cannot discuss publicly. That is genuinely possible. But the way to handle that is not to hide the code. If there is a legal requirement driving this behavior, saying so directly would cost nothing and would preserve a lot of goodwill.
The trust model for a developer tool is different from a consumer app. People running CLI tools in their build pipelines have a reasonable expectation that the tool is not making undisclosed decisions about their network traffic. That expectation got violated here, and silence from Anthropic is not helping.
Tell us about the workflow you want to improve. We will help you identify the practical next step.